Teachers Writing in the Workplace

Not long ago, my wife and I were chatting with a high school principal in her office. From her desk, she can see out an expansive window: students entering and leaving the building, the immaculate landscaping and flora that dot contribute a newness to the school grounds, and a parking lot that fills after her day has begun and is often empty again when she leaves work.

The desk is littered with files and loose papers that require anything from her complete attention to a simple perusal and signature. Her laptop sits amidst them, open as usual. She surveys her work area and sighs.

“How were we able to get it all done before?” she asks, harkening to days when she had more time to interact with students and have extensive conversations with colleagues.

My wife answered: “We didn’t have to keep checking email. We didn’t have to always be online.”

The principal nodded, tilted her head, and grimaced.


Was technology not supposed to make things easier? Supposed to save us time? Sending an email is quicker than writing or typing a memo, putting it in inner-office or U.S. Mail, and waiting for a reply. Regardless, writing has become more and more an essential duty for classroom teachers.


Placeholder Image
Due to the unrelenting influx of emails, we may find ourselves tending to our devices more than grading, planning, or teaching.


I spoke with twenty-year veteran high school teacher Leigh Buffat about professional writing in a high school. She listed several audiences for her writing: parents, principals, guidance counselors, students, and supervisors. Furthermore, as a former yearbook sponsor, she emphasized that teachers need to be able to “communicate as businesspeople,” as well. She stated that, though, she prefers phone calls in many cases, email has facilitated some matters: “Written communication has become more important since time is a precious resource. I may be in class when they’re [parents] available; they may be with a client when I’m available. Instead of waiting for a time to connect on phone, we can communicate more immediately about students’ grades or behavior and find solutions sooner.”

But along with convenience comes overuse and an abundance of messages that consume more time. Since it is less of a burden to communicate an idea, every idea seems worthy of communication.

Buffat addressed this reality, especially in terms of social media: “I don’t like when administrators and supervisors insist I be ‘linked in’ in every way they are. Let’s keep the spaces [between work and time online off contract hours] separate. Don’t tell me to follow you. I’d rather just check email at the same time every day. I don’t want administrators’ or colleagues’ work concerns imposed on me during non-contract hours.”

But before slamming the iPad to the ground and swearing off email—especially from the one colleague who insists on marking every missive as “urgent”—teachers must appreciate both the benefits of technology in their written discourse and how best to use this technology. This is especially true given the need to communicate with parents, the audience that Buffat addresses most frequently.


parent student teacher
Communication amongst all parties is crucial.


The Benefits of Contacting Parents and Choosing the Best Platform

Indubitably, technology has created better opportunities for teachers to communicate with students and parents. And before thinking about the one mom who calls weekly to check up on her son’s progress (though he has an “A” average, hovering in the mid-90s), keep in mind the many other parents whose children need more support from home, but who also lack the time to call during the school day.

Researcher Hosiin Shivrani reaffirms the long-standing belief that parental involvement—especially through communication with teachers—benefits the students. Shivrani states three positive outcomes resulting from teacher-parent communication: the parents may feel more optimistic about education; the students may consequently attach more meaning to school; and, ultimately, the students may perform better academically. A study performed by Brown University Professor Matthew Kraft and Harvard University—Kennedy School Professor Todd Rogers showed these exact benefits in a recovery credit program. In the program, teachers texted parents on a weekly basis. The researchers believe that this contributed to fewer students abandoning the program altogether and more students completing it successfully.

If technology can facilitate student-learning, then teachers need to explore how to use it most effectively. Kraft emphasizes that the more specific teachers can be in telling teachers in what ways students need to improve, the more conducive the communication will be to parental support. The communication need not be as intimate and immediate as a text-message (after all, remember that Kraft and Rogers were studying cases in which the students’ academics had reached a point beyond critical—they had already failed the class on a first attempt). Depending on the socioeconomic status of a school’s population, too, texting (and even email) may not be as viable. Gilgore, et al. cite a Pew Research Report that indicates that in 2015, two-thirds of households used iPhones. There’s a good chance that some of your struggling students live in the other third.

Buffat says when she needs to contact parents, “I try to glean a best method from their contact information—like their place of work or address.” For instance, if the place of work appears to be an office setting, she’s more likely to try email first. If the family lives in a more rural setting, she is more likely to try a phone call, thinking that internet connections might not be available or that the parents may not have an email account they are required to check.

Gilgore, et al. discuss teachers trying a variety of methods for teachers to contact parents, but also warn about overwhelming them by simultaneously sending messages in multiple formats (i.e., a phone call and a text and an email). They also warn of schools (and teachers) presenting parents with too much information. They need to be selective and provide only that information which is necessary.

Beyond Platform: Ideas on Effective Communication with Different Audiences

  1. Parents

Buffat says she is most likely to write for parents “if a student is failing or acting atrociously in class.” In these situations, she understands the importance of knowing her audience and “listening to them” first. She says, “I would ask if there’s anything going on? Are they aware? Is it going on in other classes? What’s the underlying issue I’m not getting?”


Image-1 listening
Be alert and listen. Keep your ears raised, like Lolo.


If she’s using email, she is careful about her salutations. “I look at if they’ve ever emailed,” Buffat begins. “I pay attention to greetings and salutations. If a mom signs ‘Thanks, Nancy,’ I’m not going to address her as ‘Mrs. Fortenberry.’ But if they use a formal ‘Mr.’ or ‘Mrs. So-and-so,’ then that’s how I’ll address.” This is only a small part of being sensitive. Frequently, she is responding to emails from parents or students who are concerned about being absent due to illness, and asking what they may be missing or need to make up. “I’ll tell them, ‘Don’t worry. Be sick. When you get back, we’ll work on making it up.’ Right now they just need to be getting better. If they ask if there is ‘anything I can do at home,’ I’ll tell them to ‘sleep, take medicine.’”

She has also had the experience of writing to parents in her capacity as yearbook sponsor. “When I did yearbook, they wrote to ask how to buy or worried they had missed the deadline,” she says. “Sometimes they complained about something—why is their kid not in the book, why is the name spelled wrong?—and I’ve learned not to fight fire with fire. They just want to be heard and understood. In reply, I apologize up front, remind them that we’re a student publication, and tell them, ‘Here are things I can do at this juncture. What would you like to do?’”

She adds that there are constraints she must abide. Obviously, she always wants to be truthful and provide facts and observations. “I can’t use the language I always want to use,” she laughs. “I have to clean it up. Sometimes I have to use euphemisms or innuendo.  Can’t just ask, ‘Is your kid stupid?’”


  1. Students

Writing for students mainly means writing clear instructions and communicating expectations. Buffat reminds teachers, “It’s definitely a time when you want to get [grammar and spelling] right. Also, the tone of it. Make it so your students see you as approachable in your syllabus. There’s also a matter of credibility with content. If they’re going to be doing a bunch of silliness, I’m not going to be that credible.”

In terms of strategies, she has a couple of main tactics. She says that she “gives them formatting requirements and guidelines—stuff I recall having questions about when I had to do that type of work. I anticipate their questions, though sometimes I anticipate them incorrectly. They are actually confused about something else I didn’t think about.”

She has become less inclined to communicate with students (or parents, for that matter) on social media. In her capacity as yearbook advisor, she used Twitter and Instagram for marketing. She found that “initially students enjoyed following, but not so much anymore. Social media is their hangout, a personal space. They don’t want us there like they don’t want parents there. The school has [a course delivery system] where I can set up alerts and posts.”

  1. Colleagues

Buffat says that some of her writing involves completing forms and evaluations. The audience for these may include a variety of people: a counselor or special education teacher and a principal and parents and, even, the student. She assumes a general audience and “includes only observable details, not gut feelings, using a professional and formal style.”

She acknowledges there is a perception that all educators will use immaculate grammar and high-level diction. In her experience, though, this is not always the case. She says, “They would think teachers would speak and write with correct grammar. Just as it is with parents, teachers have different backgrounds and education levels and ways of sharing knowledge. Some people may not have extensive vocabulary. What they may do day-in and day-out, they know it. They are intelligent. I am surprised when I get emails from co-workers that use non-standard English. It probably changes the way I perceive them.”

speakers audience

Part of this slip in usage she attributes to the primary struggle she sees in writing for schools: having time to write. “A lot of stuff is composed off contract hours. If not done on our own time, we wouldn’t have productive communication.  Sometimes I get stuff from people, and I say, ‘What the hell? Don’t these people have degrees?’ But they probably were rushed and didn’t have time to refine it. I get it. But I still might be inclined to take them less seriously.”

  1. Businesspeople and College Admissions Officers

In the role of yearbook sponsor, Buffat was in charge of a publication with a budget of nearly $100,000. This required drafting business contracts and contracts for advertising. She also needed to write email to yearbook company representatives and customer support people. With them, she says, “We had to be on the same page with the company, and that meant having the same vocabulary and using the correct technical terms with technical support. I had to be explicit about our issues, but I knew they didn’t have a lot of time. So it needed to be to the point.”

listener terms

Buffat did not mention writing letters of recommendation for students wishing to attend college or attain scholarships. However, I have ample experience in this matter. For the sake of the student for whom I’m writing, I’ve always been extra careful about usage. If I speak as a professional about the academic capabilities of a student, then admissions officers should not question my capabilities. Also, I ask students to complete a recommendation request form on which they will give me more information than what is on a resume. Admissions officers want to see beyond the data of a student’s test scores and gpa; they want to know who the student is, why they should invest an admissions spot or scholarship money on the student, that the student will contribute to the campus community and avoid academic probation; they want to know that the student has integrity and that the student has the resilience to overcome the difficulties that many college freshmen face. But they also want to know all of this quickly. Being able to recall a specific piece of writing or an anecdote about the student helps. Showing enthusiasm (as warranted by the students’ performance and personal traits) for the student is essential, but it is necessary to do so without hyperbolizing (after all, if several are applying to the same college, it looks funny to the admissions officer when they see applications from four different students who are each described as “my best student ever” by the same teacher). It also helps to relate a hardship the student has already overcome.



Works Cited

Buffat, Leigh. Personal Interview. 2 Feb. 2018.

Drucker, Peter. The Essential Drucker: The Best of Sixty Years of Peter Drucker’s Essential

     Writings on Management. College Business Essentials, 2008.

Gilgore, Sara, et al. “Parent-Teacher Digital Exchanges Studied. (Cover Story).” Education 

     Week, vol. 35 no. 4, 16 Sept. 2015, pp. 1-16. EBSCOhost, libproxy.nau.edu/login?



Kraft, Matthew A.1, mkraft@brown.edu and Todd2, todd_rogers@hks.harvard.edu

Rogers. “The Underutilized Potential of Teacher-To-Parent Communication: Evidence

from a Field Experiment.” Economics of Education Review, vol. 47, Aug. 2015, pp. 49-63.

EBSCOhost, doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.04.001.

Shirvani, Hosiin. “Effects of Teacher Communication on Parents’ Attitudes and Their

Children’s Behaviors at Schools.” Education, vol. 128, no. 1, Fall2007, pp. 34-47.

EBSCOhost, libproxy.nau.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?


Smith, Craig. Rhetoric and Human Consciousness: A History, 4th Edition. Waveland Press,



5 thoughts on “Teachers Writing in the Workplace

  1. Hunter,

    Your opening anecdote about you, your wife, and your principal commiserating over the struggles of digital-age communication eating away at our time is wonderfully engaging and a perfect choice to open up this particular post. I admit that, being a young teacher who has known nothing but email as the primary form of communication with colleagues, parents, and students (outside of school hours), it was very interesting to read the perspective of someone who remembers when communication was once different.

    I also really like the way your organized this post, focusing on different audiences that teachers communicate with over technology, and what are the best practices for each audience. I think this post would be very useful to educators still learning to navigate the complicated world of email communication.

    I wonder if a nice way to strengthen the conclusion of your post is to loop back to the idea about how, despite the frustrations of digital communication, we should still appreciate the value this form of communication has. Your post is already excellent, but it is just a thought!

    Carly Blodgett


  2. Hi Hunter,

    What an interesting topic. I have a few friends currently teaching in high school, and some of the stories they’ve told me about communicating with parents and administrators are likely what will keep me out of that particular branch of teaching for a little while longer.

    In reading this post, my first observation was the length. The topic is interesting, and you present it clearly, but I wonder about how the presentation might improve if you broke the post up into several smaller, more focused posts. Right now, the post is already separated in three subtopics: parents, students, and colleagues, so I wonder if those could be the focus of each of the smaller posts. You could even have a 4th post that introduces the idea of the three different audiences. I suggest this because I think the length of the post could inhibit some of its functionality. I’ve had the most success with blog posts around 400-700 words because it’s enough time to introduce an idea, get specific with it, give examples, and end it.

    My other observation was about the dog. Is there a direct purpose for the picture of the dog? This relates to some of the other pictures. I like to caption mine because it gives me a chance to offer a little explanation about why the pictures are there. Something like that could help out here.

    Looking forward to reading more!


  3. Hi Hunter,

    Because I’ve never known a professional working environment sans email (I’m 28), the opening of your blog post was really revelatory for me. I hate email because it takes up so much of my time. I feel so accomplished and relieved when I’m through my inbox—only for it to fill up again almost immediately! Half of the time, I’d prefer a face-to-face meeting or a phone call. So much more can be done and decided in a few minutes versus waiting on email responses for forever.

    Buffat’s point about there needing to be a more clear work/private division line speaks to me. It’s so easy with all the technology we have to feel obligated to answer right away or be able to answer at all times.

    I’m not a teacher, but I imagine that this would be a particularly helpful blog post for those who are. Overall, you did a great job. This is very well written and weaves in sources and quotes in very effective manner.

    I would suggest making your images smaller so those reading don’t have to scroll as much for sure. Bolding your headings would also be very helpful in terms of really differentiating between sections and making scanning the piece easier.

    Great work!



  4. Hello Hunter,

    First, I have to say that I loved your blog subphrase “Beyond Hallway Gossip”, it caught my attention and curiosity immediately, and it harkens back to those school days where that was the only way you heard about the latest news or issues. Besides my approval of that phrase, I was also struck by how professional your blog was structured, and it made it very clear that you are taking what you say very seriously and so should your readers.

    I find it very hard to find fault with your initial post thus far, as it had a captivating beginning, a well-written purpose, an expertly organized structure, and a well-rounded ending. I have to admit, I was pleased to see the sections that you separated according to the audiences Buffat had to address in various ways, and you made excellent references to your interview with her by using direct quotes as well. In addition, you made a conscious effort to include our readings from class and then some, and they were so expertly woven into your narrative that it almost took conscious effort to catch them all.

    I only have really one suggestion for the future. The size of your pictures threw off my reading just a little, because I had to scroll all the way down my view screen in order to get past the photo and on to the next paragraph. Certainly, some of the photos are interesting, but their size interrupts the perusal of the text. Believe me, I struggled with getting my own pictures the right size, and even then they did not post right. That is all I have to say for now, but I look forward to reading more of your posts in the future.

    All the best,


  5. Hi Hunter:

    What a great topic! For the readers who do not work in a school, it is a good portrayal of how much writing teachers do on a regular basis.
    In your first paragraph, you mention the “landscaping and flora that dot contribute a newness…” I would simply remove that. Your introduction is very descriptive. I was right there in the office with you.
    Your questions are great! The irony of technology adding to our work is not lost on your readers. I love the line “Since it is less of a burden to communicate an idea, every idea seems worthy of communication.” Not to mention those who consistently “reply all” to each message.
    On page 3, paragraph 3, you state “Kraft emphasizes that the more specific teachers can be in telling teachers in what ways students need to improve…” I think you might have meant parents there. In the 5th paragraph you mention “…teachers trying a variety of methods for teachers to contact parents…” I would eliminate “for teachers.”
    You have some great visuals, but the one of the dog was lost on me. Is it that he “underlies the concept of listening?”
    I am going to steal your idea of having students fill out a recommend request! I always have to track them down and ask them what they have been involved in during their middle school career.
    I felt like you simply stopped at the end without a conclusion. You might want to summarize and go back to your opening questions.
    I really enjoyed reading your blog. I was able to easily identify with Leigh Buffat. Your word choice was very descriptive without being verbose. I look forward to reading your future entries.
    Chris Bloom


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s